Видео

Skymont Look's good, I already want to see it in action. 🤤🤤😎

Qualcomm Lake

That’s great, now make it so the battery can last more than three minutes

Hey Kevin don't try spend too much money on trying to look as if you are interested in making a good impression. We like the slovenly appearance to give us the impression that you are spending all of you time trying to improve Intel products.

A little less conversation

Have Intel considered to replace the ring with a full mesh since there are only 5 clients (4P+1E-Cluster)? In my super sensitive gaming scenario I'm bothered by noisy ring issue - 13900K any busy P-core will make other cores "noisy". Also now E-core gets P-core level IPC, then what's the next main difference between them?

Looking forward to see those Skymont E-cores in action in Arrow Lake CPUs.

AMD has a validated world record in 19 Nov 2012 and intel record was not validated in 2024, so AMD wins

Thanks Steve!

That's a hard game to run on high, impressive.

Thanks for the videos, it is a great learning resource. It is amazing how much die area the Skymont Core takes up, the Performance per Area is really good. At the same time we can see how memory is not scaling as well as logic. The System Side Cache is only 8MB but takes up a lot of die area. The die area taken up by memory from all the caches combined is huge.

I love these videos. They’re very insightful and informative. And it shows that there are talented and very smart people at Intel. I’m glad Intel is coming back (after the 10nm saga), and now with a laser focus on power efficiency. x86 lives on! My first x86 was a 286!! The last Intel chip with a Sky in its name became historic. sky lake. Skymont sounds beautiful and amazing. I wonder what’s in store with Darkmont ?

What animation software/tool used to create the beautiful translations?

The new E-Core sounds very powerful, looking forward to testing it when it comes to desktop.

Brother is dancing around ArrowLake, its announced so you can say it 😁

Let's hope for good scheduler for operating system kernel.

Thanks Alejandro and team

@intel wake up, when you can lunch faceless processor like Apple?

People are talking about wanting to see this in gaming handhelds, but where I REALLY want to see it is in tablet laptops like the Surface Pro. I'm hopeful Xe Super Sampling works well for other games too. I'd love a Windows tablet that can be, ya'know, a tablet when I want it to be, but is capable of respectable gaming performance when on the go. If I can ever get a tablet laptop that can play most modern games at even 45fps 1080p mid settings without having to fumble with the PRISM compatibility layer and has access to all my desktop Windows applications, it's going to be my biggest "shut up and take my money" moment.

AVX10.2 when

4:02 Does this motherboard have the Vision Lynk Capabilities? Need to power a 4k Monitor via Display Port MODE etc> Does this motherboard have a USB c Displayport mode capable on this motherboard?

Great

Still no update on APO?

software people need to rethink all the important algorithms to not just build around multi-threading, but also unequal cores.

Gonna be buying a new laptop soon, I hope lunar lake will handle some light to heavy gaming with the xe2 architecture, Thanks for the 32 gb ram as well tho!

Skymont seems impressive. I am happy to see Intel come back. Hopefully the next Mont has avx512 (or avx10.2) support.

0000

10

1

33333333

000

1

0 T

All useless until you switch to 3nm or 4nm chips.

Question: during the Nehalem introduction, it was said that 2 cores (on one die) sharing (large) L2 in Conroe and Penryn would not be best at the quad-core level (complex + latency penalty?). Hence Nehalem went with 256K L2 dedicated to each core + shared L3. Has the 4-core sharing L2 issue been solved? to the degree that this is better than each E core having 512K dedicated? My opinion: long-term, P and E cores should be rebranded a single-thread and multi-thread. The theory is workloads that can be effectively multi-thread, greater throughput can be achieved per unit area silicon. Hence, the future processor should have few P (ST) cores for single thread tasks, and many E (MT) cores for good workloads. In the meantime, software people need to rethink the important algorithms for best multi-thread implementation,

Intel will make big comeback and beating everyone in competition.

ISA x86 creates more problems than ISA ARM(or any RISC). The cost of prediction will always exceed the lack of cost of this task in RISC. To show more efficiency in performance, you need to be ahead technologically, not behind. This is the truth of reality.

So is any of this NPU going to help with tasks outside of AI operations?? like in normal software that most people that are going to buy a portable laptop? most consumers of laptops arent going to use AI software locally, if you want high end AI computation its a cool idea to be able to do it on a laptop, but I feel like this isnt going to help performance for most consumers of laptops... unless they can accelerate software for video or image rendering.. this feels a lot like physic accelerated chips that nvidia put on their cards, Physx was pretty much abandon years later because there wasnt an incentive for devs to use it...

Lol an AIO on an A770 is the most nonsensical thing going

"You bet!" Thanks for the content. It's always great to hear the talk from the engineer!

Performance efficiency, Power efficiency, Area efficiency. This is moving in a positive direction.

Intel should have started focusing on battery life since 2010 not since 2020. Is it too little too late for x86? Barring some miracle my next laptop will be ARM ISA one.

The new Skymont cores look like a massive improvement. Previously E-cores were great for multi-thread scaling while using minimal die space, but now Skymont actually brings significant power efficiency and performance gains while still being die space efficient. The new Skymont E-cores are literally going to be more powerful than most people's current CPUs, while being vastly more power efficient.. Skymont is a homerun for Intel.

looked at P-core slide and i so believing that Intel P-core paradigm is changing from P6 into E-core design just like centrino era when P6-design called as E-core /small-core while Netburst is called as P-core / big-core and years later, Core 2 come with P6 design that used until 2024 and since that, P6 is a base of Intel Big core (until 2024) and Netburst abandoned. and now, Intel designing new P-core with the E-core design (one of the notably design is splitted scheduler between INT and VECT)

where is LP E-Core? i knew that is low power scheme in metheo lake.

How about a cpu that has more than 16 pcie lanes for consumer space

Intel and its x86 is under attack from all sides, Arms RISC in all its permutations and then RISC-5 from a number of OEMs are eating into Intel's cpu market. They need to overhaul their X86 to make it more performant and efficient. Is it even doable? And, they don't seem to be able to get out of their own way!

As an audio engineer, the gain structure on the microphone is giving me cancer.

Chadmont, Fathermont. 😎

Looks really impressive. I can't wait to see the chip on market. I would like to have the lunar lake to have more ecore and more pcore for productivity on the go.